The Chicago Tribune is reporting that “Orlando became one of the first cities in America to switch all of its employees to Google e-mail.”  The savings are impressive:

“If Orlando were to keep its current system, city officials estimate it would cost $133 a year for each of its 3,000 employees — or $399,000 — including annual software licenses.

Google is charging $45.50 per user, or $136,500. In return, everyone from city planners to police officers will use a Web-based e-mail system similar to Google’s popular Gmail, but without the advertisements that support the free consumer version. Google servers will store all city e-mail and run the application, and Google technicians — not city employees — will make sure it runs smoothly.

"The costs and IT support are someone else’s nightmare, and that’s what we’re paying for," Chief Financial Officer Rebecca Sutton said.”

More interesting is the confidence, dare I say “trust”, in using a cloud-based solution:

“[Google’s] Lock said Google will archive Orlando records, which must be kept and accessible under state public-records law, in "super-secret data centers."

And Cross [Orlando’s Chief Information Officer] said he’s confident city records, including sensitive law-enforcement and legal documents, will be safe from loss or cyberattack. Google has greater security resources, from people to money, than Orlando could muster on its own.

Besides, Cross said, the city last year contacted other e-mail providers, including Microsoft and IBM, about moving to the cloud.

"They gave us pricing that couldn’t compete with Google," he said.”

While the Los Angeles Google deal is much better known, Orlando led the way:

“Los Angeles became Google’s crown jewel in October, when that city approved a $7.25 million e-mail contract with the Internet giant, but Los Angeles has not yet moved its 30,000 employees to the Google system.

Google cited its deal with Orlando, which had already been signed, in its pitch to Los Angeles.”

In a reversal of classic technology adoption patterns, government agencies are cutting the path to cloud computing.  Interesting times.

Posted by brenda michelson at 4:41 pm in adoption, business capability offering, Cloud Watch, SaaS, use cases | Permalink | Comments(0)
| Trackback URL

Reports from the Trenches: What’s Working in Virtualization and Green IT, moderated by Larry Hale, Director, Office of Infrastructure Optimization, GSA

Panelists:

  • Jack Baxter, Manager, IT&S, Government Printing Office
  • Richard Fichera, Director, Blade Systems Strategy, HP
  • Bernard Golden, CEO, HyperStratus
  • Dale Wicklizer, US Public Sector CTO, NetApp

Larry Hale has some starter questions for the panel:

1. Biggest challenges in adopting virtualization?

Jack Baxter: Greatest challenges: application qualification, funding, hardware and how it’s going to be used.  Heterogeneous environment calls for a lot of up-front research.

 more >>

Posted by brenda michelson at 5:55 pm in adoption, Blog, sustainability, virtualization | Permalink | Comments(0)
| Trackback URL

Cloud Computing in Government: A Progress Report, moderated by Robert Ames of IBM

Panelists:

  • Doug Bourgeois, Director, National Business Center, Dept. of the Interior
  • Casey Coleman, CIO, GSA
  • William (Bill) Turnbull, Associate CIO for Advanced Technology and Systems Integration, Department of Energy

Robert Ames of IBM opens, sets context for panel and quips on the 4th Cloud Delivery model, “Hype as a Service”, via David Vap.

Casey Coleman, opens saying hard to give progress report at this early stage, but there is a lot of momentum for cloud computing in the government.  A big part of that momentum is the recently launched Apps.gov site. 

 more >>

Posted by brenda michelson at 3:47 pm in adoption, Blog, use cases | Permalink | Comments(0)
| Trackback URL